eDiscovery Document Review & Production
Defensible, technology-assisted document review and production managed end to end by experienced attorneys and project managers, delivering consistency and efficiency at any scale.
eDiscovery Document Review & Production capabilities
Managed Document Review
Cost-effective managed review that does not sacrifice quality. Our teams apply advanced technology and proven workflows to review documents accurately and efficiently across regulatory investigations and litigation.
Technology-Assisted Review (TAR)
Advanced algorithms and machine learning identify relevant documents quickly and accurately, reducing review time and cost while maintaining high accuracy even across collections numbering in the millions.
Review Management and Quality Control
Experienced project managers oversee the review to keep it consistent and on schedule, with quality-control processes that make review decisions consistent and defensible.
Production and Redaction Services
Defensible identification and production of relevant documents, with careful redaction to protect privileged and confidential information throughout the process.
Customized, Transparent Engagements
Workflows tailored to each matter's goals and budget, supported by regular updates and clear, concise reporting across the project lifecycle.
eDiscovery Document Review & Production — matters we are engaged for
Volume outruns the review budget before it starts
The collected set is an order of magnitude larger than the matter can fund reviewing linearly. Culling by date, custodian and domain before anyone reads a document is where the cost is actually decided.
The other side challenges the search methodology
Search terms negotiated without testing routinely under- or over-return. Validating them against a sample, and being able to show the validation, is what converts a methodology fight into a documented process.
Privilege review is the schedule risk
A log running to thousands of entries, with a claw-back argument waiting at the end of it, is where productions slip. A Rule 502(d) order entered up front changes the consequence of an error from a waiver fight to a phone call.
Production format is agreed too late to matter
Load files, metadata fields and native-versus-image decisions are cheap to specify and expensive to redo. Settling them before processing avoids reproducing the same documents twice.
eDiscovery Document Review & Production — frequently asked questions
What is technology-assisted review (TAR), and when does it help?
TAR uses advanced algorithms and machine learning to surface relevant documents and eliminate irrelevant ones, dramatically reducing the volume requiring human review. It is especially valuable in large-scale litigation involving very large document collections, helping matters finish on time and within budget while maintaining accuracy.
How do you keep review decisions defensible?
Experienced project managers oversee the review process, and our quality-control procedures ensure review decisions are consistent and defensible, supporting successful outcomes in litigation and investigations.
How do you protect privileged and confidential information during production?
Our production and redaction services identify and produce relevant documents while ensuring privileged and confidential information is properly redacted, allowing defensible, efficient production in litigation and regulatory matters.
Can you handle both small and large matters?
Yes. We advise on big and small cases alike, tailoring technology, staffing, and workflows to the specific needs and budget of each matter, from reviews of thousands of documents to collections numbering in the millions.
eDiscovery Document Review & Production — questions, terms and comparisons
eDiscovery experts who testify to this work
Full expert panel →
Daniel B. Garrie
Founder
Expert Witness Testimony · eDiscovery Strategy
Roland Cloutier
Expert Consultant
Expert Witness Testimony
Gary Corn
Director, Technology, Law & Security, American University
Expert Witness Testimony
Our experts serve as court-appointed special masters, forensic neutrals, and arbitrators — 40 appointments are listed by matter and citation.