Skip to content

eDiscovery Services

Defensible discovery, from preservation to the witness stand.

End-to-end eDiscovery — strategy, preservation, collection, processing, review, and expert testimony — engineered to be proportional, defensible, and ready to withstand challenge.

Overview

Electronic discovery rarely fails for lack of technology — it fails for lack of judgment about what to preserve, how broadly to collect, and how to defend those choices when they are challenged. We run the full discovery lifecycle, from the first litigation hold through processing, hosted review, production, and, when it matters most, sworn testimony about how the work was done. The goal at every step is a record that is proportional to the dispute and durable under scrutiny.

Litigators, general counsel, and corporate legal teams engage us when the volume, the deadline, or the stakes outgrow an in-house process — multi-custodian collections across email, chat, mobile, and cloud platforms; data spread across modern collaboration tools; and matters where opposing counsel is likely to contest scope, spoliation, or methodology. We also serve as court-appointed special masters and neutrals, structuring discovery protocols and resolving disputes between parties.

Because our team includes both lawyers and forensic technologists, the same people who design the collection plan can explain it to a judge. That continuity is what makes a discovery effort defensible: decisions are documented as they are made, chain of custody is preserved throughout, and the methodology can be reconstructed and defended long after the data was first touched.

Related results

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between eDiscovery and digital forensics?

eDiscovery is the structured process of identifying, preserving, collecting, reviewing, and producing electronically stored information for litigation or investigation, usually at large scale. Digital forensics is the deeper examination of a specific device or data source to recover, authenticate, or analyze evidence — for example, reconstructing deleted files or establishing who did what on a system. The two overlap and we deliver both.

When should a litigation hold be issued?

A duty to preserve relevant information generally arises when litigation is reasonably anticipated — not only after a complaint is filed. Issuing a clear, well-scoped hold promptly, and tracking its acknowledgment, is one of the most effective ways to avoid later spoliation disputes. We help teams define custodians, data sources, and scope so the hold is both defensible and proportional.