Court record
The record, on the docket
Anyone can say their experts are court-tested. Below is the part you can check yourself. Every entry links to the filing on CourtListener, which is free and needs no account.
What makes this firm different
Every entry below is a document on a public federal docket. Each links to the free copy on CourtListener, which needs no account and no PACER fee. The quotations are the court's words or the document's own, not ours.
We publish it because almost nobody else in this field does. Compare any of the large consultancies: they name their testifying experts and stop there, with no matter, no court and no docket number. A claim you cannot check is a claim you have to take on faith, and evidence work is the last place anyone should be asked for faith.
This is not the whole record, and it is not close to it. Most of this firm's neutral and special-master work is arbitration, which is private by design, and a substantial part of its litigation work is filed under seal. Neither can be listed here. What is listed is what a reader can check without taking our word for anything.
- 8
- matters
- 11
- filings listed
- 5
- courts
- 3
- experts
Daniel B. Garrie
In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
U.S. District Court, N.D. California · 3:18-md-02843-VC · Dkt. 709 · 2021-07-20
Appointed Special Discovery Master under Fed. R. Civ. P. 53
“Pursuant to Rule 53(a) and with the consent of the parties, Daniel Garrie of JAMS is appointed as the special discovery master in this case.”
Read the filing on CourtListenerOrder appointing special discovery master (PDF, 2 pages)
In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
U.S. District Court, N.D. California · 3:18-md-02843-VC · Dkt. 734 · 2021-08-25
Supplemental Rule 53 appointment order, fixing scope, appeal route and compensation
“The parties consent to the appointment of Daniel Garrie of JAMS as the special discovery master to assist the Court in the resolution of discovery disputes.”
Read the filing on CourtListenerSupplemental appointment order (PDF, 6 pages)
Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corp.
U.S. District Court, C.D. California · 8:21-cv-01628-DOC-JDE · Dkt. 58 · 2021-12-27
Consent and disclosure affidavit filed on appointment as Special Master
“Consent and Affidavit of Special Master Daniel Garrie, Esq”
Read the filing on CourtListenerConsent and affidavit of special master
Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corp.
U.S. District Court, C.D. California · 8:21-cv-01628-DOC-JDE · Dkt. 611 · 2022-12-15
Sitting as one of three Special Masters, issuing orders on discovery
“SPECIAL MASTERS' ORDER RE: JOHN "JOCK" MAWSON DEPOSITION by Special Master(s) Daniel Garrie, James L. Smith, Bradley O'Brien.”
Read the filing on CourtListenerSpecial masters' order
Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. v. United States, 120 Fed. Cl. 460
U.S. Court of Federal Claims · 07-613C · Footnote 2 · 2015-04-06
Scholarship cited by the court in a published opinion
“See Daniel Garrie & Francis Allegra, "Plugged In: Guidebook on Software and the Law," § 3.3 (2013).”
Read the filing on CourtListenerPublished opinion, 120 Fed. Cl. 460
Arrivalstar S.A. v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 760
U.S. Court of Federal Claims · 11-784C · Footnote · 2012-08-20
Commentary considered by the court when setting an eDiscovery protocol
“The court also considered the Model Order drafted by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on this subject … as well as recent commentary on this subject, see Daniel Garrie, "The E-Discovery Dance for Patents: Changing the Tune".”
Read the filing on CourtListenerPublished opinion, 106 Fed. Cl. 760
J-Michael Roberts
Criteo S.A. v. Steel House, Inc.
U.S. District Court, C.D. California · 2:16-cv-04207-SVW-MRW · Dkts. 25, 26 · 2016-08-15
Declarant for the plaintiff on a contested motion for a preliminary injunction, with technical exhibits filed on physical media
“Non-Paper Physical Exhibit of a CD containing Exhibits 2-5 to the Declaration of J-Michael Roberts in Support of Criteo S.A.'s Reply in Further Support of Criteo's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.”
See the docket on CourtListenerDocket entry only — no free copy of the declaration exists on CourtListener
Jeremy Desor
United States v. Hitt
U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1:19-cr-00043 · Dkt. 2 · 2018-10-04
Sworn affiant on the criminal complaint and arrest warrant application, as an FBI Special Agent
“AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND ARREST WARRANT. I, Jeremy Desor, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows.”
Read the filing on CourtListenerAffidavit (PDF, 15 pages)
United States v. Elbaz
U.S. District Court, E.D. New York · 1:17-mj-00821 · Dkt. 1 · 2017-09-15
Sworn affiant, as an FBI Special Agent, in the removal proceeding arising from an international investment-fraud prosecution
“JEREMY DESOR, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent …”
Read the filing on CourtListenerRule 5 affidavit (PDF, 26 pages)
United States v. Brugnara
U.S. District Court, N.D. California · 3:14-cr-00306-WHA · Dkt. 725 · 2015-08-31
Presence at an evidentiary hearing requested by the court, by name
“REQUEST FOR AGENT JEREMY DESORS PRESENCE AT EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Hon. William Alsup on 8/31/2015.”
Read the filing on CourtListenerOrder requesting the agent's presence
United States v. Brugnara
U.S. District Court, N.D. California · 3:14-cr-00306-WHA · Dkts. 722, 735, 738 · 2015-09-18
Three sworn declarations filed by the government during the prosecution
“Declaration of Special Agent Jeremy Desor in Support of 737 Response by USA as to Luke D. Brugnara.”
See the docket on CourtListenerDocket entries only — no free copy of these three documents exists on CourtListener
Verified by reading each document or docket entry on CourtListener. Where a court's electronic record names a document but no free copy exists, that is stated on the entry rather than hidden. Last verified 2026-09-12. The firm’s fuller account of its work, including arbitration and mediation that no public docket records, is on the appointments page.
Have a matter that turns on the evidence?
Tell us what you're facing and we'll point you to the right team.

