Tag Archives: process

04 Dec

Criminal E-Discovery (Part 2 of 5)

Criminal E-Discovery: 21st Century Paperless Trails (Part 2 of 5) September 4, 2012 In this second posting in the five-part series on criminal e-discovery, Daniel Garrie looks at the burdens, benefits, and federal rules surrounding the use of e-discovery in criminal proceedings. E-discovery is rapidly making headway in civil proceedings, but the criminal courts have

Read More
30 Jul

E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Patent Litigation (Part 3 of 5)

E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Patent Litigation: Changing The Tune In this third post of the five-part series on e-discovery in intellectual property patent litigation , Daniel Garrie analyzes the Federal Circuit’s model order regarding e-discovery in patent cases. [1]  In addition, the series briefly describes the purpose behind the model order,  describes its key provisions,

Read More
30 Jul

E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Patent Litigation (Part 2 of 5)

E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Patent Litigation: Changing The Tune In this second post of the five-part series on e-discovery in intellectual property patent litigation , Daniel Garrie analyzes the Federal Circuit’s model order regarding e-discovery in patent cases. [1]  In addition, the series briefly describes the purpose behind the model order, ( describes its key

Read More
20 May

E-Discovery Services

Law & Forensics provides e-discovery technology and process consulting services. Unlike other system integration service providers, we provide an integrated holistic view of e-discovery, offering expert consulting across all aspects of litigation support, including: system integration, methods and procedures, review strategies, managed operations and predictive coding. E-discovery System Integration Solution architecture Design of data and

Read More
03 May

E-Discovery in Delaware Federal Court — Part 3 of 3

SEARCH A very interesting development set out in the default standard is in respect to search methodology. Specifically, the default standard holds that when a producing party uses search terms to find responsive information, it shall disclose such terms to the requesting party. This judicially mandated transparency with keywords presents an interesting question if the

Read More
03 May

E-Discovery in Delaware Federal Court — Part 2 of 3

The default standard does not require that each party to a case designate an e-discovery liaison through which all e-discovery requests are to be made. However, identifying such an individual can certainly aid in providing a smooth e-discovery experience. The individual can be a third-party consultant, an employee of the party, or counsel. The key

Read More
03 May

E-Discovery in Delaware Federal Court — Part 1 of 3

On Dec. 8, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware adopted a “Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI)”[FOOTNOTE 1] that was seven years in the making. The default standard replaces the old ad hoc mixture of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, case law, and local rules

Read More
13 Jan

Cloud Computing: Part 3 of 3: Plus and Negatives Around Cloud Computing

Part 3:  Plus and Negatives Around Cloud Computing It is not a trivial task to migrate systems, data and users to a new system and especially one that exists in the cloud. However, companies that do so successfully achieve visibility into spending on cloud resources and manage the lifecycle for each instance, gain the ability

Read More
12 Jan

Failure to Preserve Data Renders Compliance Officer Liable

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently gave yet another reminder of the importance of adequately preserving electronically stored data. The SEC, on July 2, 2010, found that vFinance Investments Inc., a Florida based broker dealer, violated securities laws by failing to preserve and produce electronic communications requested by the SEC as required by Section

Read More
11 Jan

Defining E-Discovery in Arbitration

How E-Discovery differs in arbitration versus court proceedings, and how and when to use an E-Discovery expert in arbitration to ensure a swift, cost-effective process.  Arbitration is a type of dispute resolution – specifically, the private, judicial determination of a dispute by an independent third-party.  Arbitration proceedings are generally adversarial in nature, but are less

Read More
Page 1 of 3123